Showing posts with label Open Cluster. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Open Cluster. Show all posts

Monday, 9 January 2023

Messier 45: The Pleiades...

Messier 45: The Pleiades...

Object: Messier 45
Type: Open cluster with reflection nebula
Constellation: Taurus
Distance: 440 light years
Equipment: Atik 460/EFW 2, Samyang 135mm lens@ F2, Vixen GPDX mount, guiding with Lodestar X2/PHD
Date: January 8th. 2023
Subframes: 12 x 300s each for LRGB, flats, bias as dark frames.

Set high in the winter sky as part of Orion’s glittering retinue, the Pleiades have certainly been known to Man ever since prehistoric times, ever since the first glimmerings of human intelligence compelled our ancestors to look upwards to the night sky in awe and wonder.

At a distance of about 440 light years, the Pleiades is one of the nearest star clusters to Earth. It is certainly the nearest Messier object to Earth, and is the most obvious star cluster to the naked eye in the night sky.

Location of image field of view in the night sky...
In Greek mythology, the Pleiades were the seven daughters of the Titan, Atlas, who was condemned by Zeus to forever bear the weight of the heavens as punishment for rebelling against the Olympian gods. Without their father to protect them, the Pleiades attracted the amorous attentions of the nearby hunter, Orion, and so to save them, Zeus transformed them into the stars we see today. Atlas and his wife, Pleione, also became part of the starry retinue of the Pleiades: “Pleiades” means “the daughters of Pleione”, and Mum and Dad keep watch over their daughters as the two stars closely adjacent stars on the eastern side of the cluster.


The Pleiades have been traditionally known as a group of seven stars. In various Greek and Roman writings, they are referred to as The Starry Seven, The Seven Virgins or the Seven Atlantic Sisters. These ancient descriptions come from days long before the advent of telescopes or binoculars, yet today, only six Pleiads are easily visible to the unaided eye. This state of affairs is supported by modern measurements of the brightness of the stars of the Pleiades. Only six of them are above “fifth magnitude”, the accepted threshold for naked eye visibility.

Magnitudes of the nine brightest members of the Pleiades are shown in the greyscale image below:

Magnitudes of the nine brightest Pleiads...

With an apparent magnitude of +2.85, the brightest star in the cluster is Alcyone, a blue-white B-type giant, similar in type to the other bright B-type stars in the Pleiades cluster. Alcyone has a mass of 6 times that of the Sun, and an effective radius of almost ten times that of the Sun, but the actual radius is lesser at poles and greater at the equator due to its high rotational velocity, which causes it to have an ellipsoidal shape. Its temperature is approximately 12,300 K (over twice as hot as our Sun) with the actual temperature being greater at the poles and lesser at the equator. Its luminosity is 2,030 times that of the Sun.

The light of the cluster is dominated by hot blue luminous stars that have formed comparatively recently in astronomical terms. Ages for star clusters can be estimated by comparing the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram for the cluster with theoretical models of stellar evolution and using this technique, ages for the Pleiades of between 75 and 150 million years have been estimated.

One of the oldest traditions concerning the cluster is the persistent myth of a “lost Pleiad”. The Greeks identified her as Electra, who is said to have veiled her face at the burning of Troy. Another story casts Merope in the role, as she reputedly hid her face in shame at having married a mortal, the King of Corinth, while all her other sisters were wedded to gods.

The Greek poet Aratus (310-240 BC) refers to the tradition of the “Lost Pleiad” when he wrote:

“…Their number seven, though the myths oft say
And poets feign, that one has passed away…”

This tradition is not confined to Greek mythology. The story of a lost Pleiad also appears in Japanese lore: the cluster is mentioned under the name Mutsuraboshi ("six stars") in the 8th-century Kojiki (an early Japanese chronicle dating from the early 8th century), and is now known as Subaru. A similar theme figures in the legends of Australian aborigines, natives of the Gold Coast of Africa and the head-hunters of Borneo:

“Their Sister Stars that were once seven
Mourn for their missing mate in Heaven…”

It seems that the legend of the lost Pleiad may have a basis in fact, however. Those modern brightness measurements have revealed that the mythical mother of the Pleiades, Pleione, is variable in brightness by at least half a magnitude, and may well once have been above the threshold of naked eye visibility.

Galileo was the first astronomer to view the Pleiades through a telescope. He discovered that the cluster contains many stars too dim to be seen with the naked eye. He published his observations, including a sketch of the Pleiades showing 36 stars, in his treatise Sidereus Nuncius in March 1610.

Today, we know that the cluster is about 80 light-years across and contains over 1,000 statistically confirmed members, a figure that excludes an unresolved number of binary stars, which make up over 50% of the total stars in the cluster.

Curiously, the 11th century Talmud (the central text of Rabbinic Judaism) uses the term kimah to describe the number of stars in the Pleiades, a word which means “over one hundred”.

Another thing revealed by long exposure photography is that the Pleiades are veiled in fine, dense threads of nebulosity, like cirrus clouds or interstellar cobwebs. It is questionable whether these are truly visible to the naked eye today, yet some translations of the biblical Book of Job refer to the “Chains of the Pleiades”. The seventh century Arabian poet Amr al Kais also hints at the nebulosity:

“The hour when the Pleiades appeared in the firmament
Like the folds of a silken sash variously decked with gems…

Perhaps the most famous reference to the Pleiades nebulosity in English literature occurs in Tennyson’s Locksley Hall…

“Many a night from yonder ivied casement, ere I went to rest
Did I look on great Orion, sloping slowly to the west
Many a night I saw the Pleiads, rising thro’ the mellow shade
Glitter like a swarm of fireflies tangled in a silver braid…”

Charles Messier measured the position of the cluster and included it as M45 in his catalogue of comet-like objects, published in 1771. Messier's inclusion of the Pleiades has been noted as curious, as most of Messier's objects were much fainter and more easily confused with comets. The brightest area of nebulosity (called “Tempel’s Nebula) lies to the south of Merope does indeed look comet-like in appearance, however, so perhaps that is why Messier included the Pleiades in his famous catalogue.

These reflection nebulae can clearly be seen in the main image above, and more detailed photographs of the area show a mass of fine filaments that glitter with reflected starlight.

They are included in the 1966 catalogue of reflection nebulae compiled by Sidney van den Bergh, and are shown marked on the grey scale image below:

van den Burgh reflection nebulae in the Pleiades...

This dust was once thought to be left over material from the cluster star formation, but is now considered likely to be an unrelated dust cloud in the interstellar medium through which the stars are currently passing. The dust cloud is estimated to be moving at a speed of approximately 18 km/s relative to the stars in the cluster.  

The long exposures used in this image show up the interstellar dust around the Pleiades as a brownish cloudy background.

The total mass contained in the cluster is estimated to be about 800 solar masses and is dominated by fainter and redder stars, although its visible light is dominated by young, hot blue stars. The cluster contains many brown dwarfs, which are objects with less than about 8% of the Sun's mass, not heavy enough for nuclear fusion reactions to start in their cores and become proper stars. They may constitute up to 25% of the total population of the cluster, although they contribute less than 2% of the total mass.

The Pleiades have long been known to be a physically related group of stars rather than just a chance alignment. When studies were first made of the stars' proper motions, it was found that they are all moving in the same direction across the sky, at the same rate, further demonstrating that they were related. The cluster itself is moving at the leisurely pace of 32 km/sec towards the south of what is currently the constellation of Orion. Like most open clusters, the Pleiades will not stay gravitationally bound forever. Astronomers estimate that the cluster will survive for about another 250 million years, after which it will gradually disperse due to gravitational interactions with its galactic neighbourhood.


Saturday, 6 March 2021

Pleiades (M45) and Mars...

Conjunction of M45 and Mars

Object: M45 (the Pleiades or Seven Sisters), Mars
Type: Open cluster and planetary conjunction 
Constellation: Taurus
Date: March 5th., 2021
Equipment: ATIK 460EX with EFW2, Samyang 135mm lens @f2.8, Vixen GPDX mount, guiding with Lodestar X2/PHD
Subframes: 20 x 10s each for luminance, red, green and blue, flats, no darks (hot pixel removal in Astroart).

This image was an unplanned shot; I was attempting to gather 600 second subs for my Sh2-273 project, but clouds began to intermittently drift over, making long subs impossible. Rather than waste a rare clear, dark and moon/free evening, I swung the rig around to M45 and its conjunction with Mars. The planet is long past opposition but it was still as bright as nearby Aldebaran, and was only about 2 degrees from the cluster.  As it won't be this close to the Pleiades until March 2036,  I thought it was worth capturing.

The short and numerous exposures allowed me to reject the cloud-fogged ones. I was pleasantly surprised by the amount of cluster nebulosity captured given the very short exposure length.

Each of the R, G and B channels were stacked in Astroart, and a nasty gradient removed with the AA plug-in.  An RGB image was prepared in PaintShop Pro. No stretch was applied, but a mild Gaussian blur was used to smooth out the rather blocky stars (the 4.54u pixels are rather under-sampling at 135mm).

The luminance stack was similarly gradient-scrubbed then blurred, and star reduction applied in PSP (background selected with "magic wand", inverted to select stars, selection expanded and feathered by a few pixels, then "eroded").  A mild edge-preserving smooth was applied to reduce noise, and a selective mild stretch applied to bring up the Pleiades luminosity was applied.  This was then pasted over the RGB one in luminance mode to given the final image. 

Sunday, 19 July 2020

NGC 6820...

Ha/Ha/SII/OIII = LRGB

Object: NGC 6820, Sh2-86 (containing star cluster NGC 6823)
Type: Emission nebula with open cluster
Constellation: Vulpecula
Distance: 6,000 light years
Date: July 10th/11th, 18th/19th. 2020
Equipment: ATIK 460EX with EFW2, Skywatcher f5.5 Esprit 100 ED refractor, Avalon Linear mount, guiding with Lodestar X2/PHD
Subframes: 16 x 600s Ha, 8 x 600s SII, OIII (2x2 binned) no flats/darks (hot pixel removal in Astroart).


Strictly speaking, NGC 6820 is a small reflection nebula near open cluster NGC 6823, discovered on August 7, 1864 by Albert Marth. The reflection nebula and cluster are embedded in a large faint emission nebula called Sh2-86, but the whole area of nebulosity is usually referred to as NGC 6820. Cluster NGC 6823 was discovered on July 17, 1785 by William Herschel

Map showing approximate image field of view
The rather obscure constellation of Vulpecula lies overhead during UK summer evenings, bounded within the three bright stars of Deneb, Vega and Altair, together called the "Summer Triangle". The whole area is rich in deep sky objects, lying as it does on the plane of the Milky Way, which itself can be glimpsed as a faint hazy band of light on those rare clear summer evenings. Vulpecula itself, although small, contains several objects of note, including M27, the Dumbbell Nebula.

Open star cluster NGC 6823 is about 50 light years across and lies about 6000 light years away. The centre of the cluster formed about two million years ago and is dominated in brightness by a host of bright young blue stars packed in a Trapezium-formed region about 1.3 x 0.7 light-years across. Outer parts of the cluster contain even younger stars. It forms the core of the Vulpecula OB1 stellar association.

The most striking feature in the image above is the trunk-like pillar of dust and gas protruding from the eastern side of the nebula towards the adjacent star cluster. The huge pillars of gas and dust are formed by surrounding gas and dust being pushed and eroded away by stellar winds and radiation from the brightest cluster stars. Dark globules of gas and dust (Bok globules) are also visible in the nebula.

Bok globules, named after the Dutch astronomer Bart Bok (who proposed their existence in the 1940′s) are dark clouds of dense cosmic dust and gas within star-forming regions in which usually star formation takes place. They most commonly result in the formation of double or multiple star systems.

I nearly didn’t bother processing the Ha data. The seeing on the night of July 10th/11th was terrible, and it was very hard to get a sharp focus on a star. The nebula itself also wasn’t as bright as I thought it might be and so retrospectively, 600 second unbinned exposures against a less-than-dark summer sky was perhaps rather optimistic. Sure enough, the nebula itself was faint and rather fuzzy due to poor focus and required a hefty stretch such that the result was overwhelmed by bloated stars (see below)...

Original Ha stack, with bloated stars
Just as an experiment, I decided to run the above image through Starnet, a piece of freeware that has the ability to remove stars from images of nebulae. I was rather surprised and pleased with the result (below).

Starnet rendition of stretched Ha stack...
I think that completely starless images of nebulae do look a bit weird however, so I blended it with an unstretched copy of the original stack that just more or less showed stars. The lack of stretching meant the starts hadn’t blown out and after a mild Gaussian blur (0.8, just to avoid a “painted-in” look), I dropped the star layer back onto the starless version in PSP "lighten" mode to produce what became the luminance/red channel (see image below).

NGC 6820 (Hydrogen alpha only)...
I finally got the SII and OIII subframes (600s binned) last nightin between a few clouds (18th/19th July) that enabled me to complete a colour rendition of this object. Colour RGB image was produced in Astroart (red - Ha, green - SII, blue - OIII) and finished in PSP, layering the Ha stack back over the RGB image as a luminance layer as the OIII/SII stars were a bit blown out. There wasn't much in the way of SII data at all, just a sort of general glow in the central area of the nebula.

References:


Tuesday, 23 June 2020

Messier 16: The Eagle Nebula...

M16: the Eagle Nebula...

Object: Messier 16 (NGC 6611: nebula catalogued as IC 4703, Sh2-49)
Type: Open cluster with nebula
Constellation: Serpens Cauda
Distance: 6,000 light years
Date: June 22nd. 2020
Equipment: ATIK 460EX with EFW2, Skywatcher f5.5 Esprit 100 ED refractor, Avalon Linear mount, guiding with Lodestar X2/PHD
Subframes: 12 x 300s Ha, 12 x 300s + 6 x 300s (2x2 binned) OIII, no flats/darks (hot pixel removal in Astroart).

The sixteenth entry in Charles Messier’s famous catalogue of deep sky objects has a long and interesting history. The star cluster itself was first discovered by Swiss astronomer Jean-Philippe de Cheseaux in 1745–46, and was subsequently “rediscovered” on June 3, 1764 by Messier (who listed it as M16 in his own catalogue).

Messier described M16 as a “cluster of faint stars mingled with faint luminosity” although it is not clear that he actually observed the nebula itself, as Messier often accredited star clusters with nebulosity (a product of the poor quality of his telescopes rather than his undoubted ability as an observer).

French astronomer Etienne Trouvelot subsequently observed the nebula and described it in detail (nicknaming it “the Fan”) prior to British astronomer Issac Roberts photographing it in 1894. 

For the IC catalogue, John Dreyer treated M16 as being primarily the cluster itself, listed it as NGC 6611, and added the IC entry for the nebula lit by the cluster.

M16 has had various popular monikers, but the “Eagle nebula” seems to have stuck (although I think Trouvelot’s name is the most sensible). The occasionally-used "Star Queen Nebula" was introduced by Robert Burnham, Jr., in his lyrical description of the object in his classic Celestial Handbook, reflecting his characterization of the central pillar as the "Star Queen", shown in silhouette. 

Location of image field, looking south on June 22nd
Messier 16 can be found in the constellation of Serpens Cauda, low in the southern mid-Summer sky from UK latitudes (see map opposite) where, on rare evenings, the faint glow of the centre of our Milky Way can be glimpsed. M16 is best seen visually in a low-powered, wide field telescope. 4-inch instruments will resolve about 20 stars against several regions of faint nebulosity. The brightest portion of the nebula (which I imaged back in 2006) spans about 20 arc-seconds (a bit less than the diameter of the full moon) although my latest image above shows that it is just the brightest part of a whole expanse of faint nebulosity lurking in the distant Sagittarius arm of our galaxy.

Unfortunately, the general public’s expectations of night sky observing have been raised by the Hubble Space telescope and its iconic images of the Pillars of Creation, and folk are often disappointed by the faint, monochromatic real life views of nebulae such as M16 through amateur telescopes

The pillared, dust-strewn heart of M16 is a stellar nursery, where stars are being born inside dense clouds of cold gas. The detailed Hubble images of several of these natal cocoons led to their naming as the “Pillars of Creation”. The images show these clouds bathed in intense ultraviolet light from M16’s cluster of young, massive stars, with jets of gas streaming off the pillars as the intense radiation heats and evaporates it into space. Denser regions of the pillars are shielding material beneath them from the powerful radiation.

Imaging from the Medway valley with a 4-inch refractor, one is at a slight disadvantage compared to the Hubble telescope. Instead of the vacuum of space, my telescope is attempting to peer through a haze of dust and light-polluted air, particularly as M16 never rises greater than 25 degrees above my southern horizon.  Also, at this time of year, the sky has no true astronomical darkness as the sun never sets more than about 14 degrees below the horizon, although to me the sky looked as dark as it ever does when I started out taking sub-frames at around 23.30 on a warm summer’s evening. 

Auto-guiding wasn’t brilliant given that I was trying to image through warm air low in the sky, but it was good enough.  The Ha data was reasonable and given that I only had about 3 hours of darkness to play with, I swapped over to gathering some OIII frames after I had a dozen Ha frames in the electronic bag. 

Whilst the true colour of deep sky celestial objects is a fairly subjective thing, I am no fan of the “Hubble pallet”, a colour scheme used by NASA to render its images (and which as a result is now fashionable with amateur astro-imagers) whereby H-alpha light is assigned to the green channel and S-II to the red, with OIII as the blue. 

To me, hydrogen emission nebulae should be red, not lurid psychedelic yellows, greens or blues.  However, the plethora of such images of M16 led me to expect a much stronger OIII signal than I was actually getting. Fortunately, I had logged on to Stargazers Lounge and was able to ask the question, with veteran astro-imager Carole Pope suggesting that I take 2x2 “binned” exposures (where four adjacent pixels are bulked together to act as one on the camera chip, increasing sensitivity and reducing background “noise”). I don’t like the way this sometimes makes smaller stars a bit blocky, but it seemed to work OK this time and I was able to grab a few brighter images before an owl sat on my telescope (I think!).

Earlier, when I walked down the garden slope to my observatory to set up, a barn owl had swooped just in front of me, a white flash in my head-torch light that had startled me no end.  I have been visited by the local tawny owls in the past and indeed, one had once flown into the open dome hatch while I was in the observatory, giving me another late-night heart attack experience.

On this occasion, I was keeping an eye on the equipment remotely via a Cat 6 cable link from the observatory lap-top to another indoors. Suddenly, the auto-guiding graph shot off-scale and I thought “cable snag”. I dashed down to the observatory, where everything fortunately seemed normal, although the target was now off-centre. Looking around though, there were a couple of pale feathers on the floor (no other “debris”, luckily…) and I suspect I may have had another avian intruder. Whether the faint light of various LEDs or the gentle ticking of the mount tracking motors attracts them, I don’t know, but I decided to quit while I was ahead. By this time, it was around 3.00 am and the sky was starting to brighten anyway.

It was nice to see Jupiter and Saturn, low together towards the south in the peaceful darkness, with the bright baleful orange of Mars rising over my south-eastern horizon. I toyed with the idea of dragging my C9.25 out for a closer look but thought better of it, and went to bed instead. I am getting old.

Hubble image compared with centre crop from main image, showing "The Pillars of Creation"...

I colour-combined the separate Ha and OIII stacks in both PaintShop Pro and Astroart (with Ha as RED and OIII as blue, with a 60:40 blend of OIII and Ha as a green channel), and got two strikingly different results. The AA version was very red, the PSP a more subdued orange. In the end, I settled for a blend of the two that you see here.

For amusement, I thought it would be interesting to compare the detail in the Hubble image to that obtained by my more modest set-up (see above). Whilst I think it is possible to tell which is which, I was surprised to find that most of the prominent features can be found in my version.

Update:

There is a bit of freeware kicking around on the internet called Starnet. It uses a clever algorithm to rub out stars from astropics.  I hadn't had much luck with getting it to work until my son came home from university and managed to run it on his computer.

Here's what M16 looks like without stars...


Not sure if I like it. It looks like a Turner painting. It does open up possibilities for image processing as you can mess around with selectively processing areas of the image without messing up stars, which can be added back in afterwards. 

Wednesday, 4 December 2019

Sharpless 2-142: The "Wizard" Nebula...

Sh2-142: The "Wizard" Nebula...

Object: Sharpless 2-142 (Sh2-142), with open cluster NGC 7380
Type: Emission Nebula and open cluster
Constellation: Cepheus
Distance: 9700 light years
Dates: 29th November, 2nd and 3rd December 2019
Equipment: ATIK 460EX with EFW2, Skywatcher f5.5 Esprit 100 ED refractor, Avalon Linear mount, guiding with Lodestar X2/PHD
Subframes: 16 x 600s H-alpha, 16 x 600s SII, 16 x 600s OIII, no flats/darks (hot pixel removal in Astroart).

Sharpless 142 is a diffuse emission nebula surrounding the developing open star cluster NGC 7380. NGC 7380 was discovered by Caroline Herschel in 1787. William Herschel included his sister's discovery in his catalogue, and labelled it H VIII.77. The nebula itself is very faint and eluded the eagle-eyed Herschels.

Stellarium map showing location of Sh2-142
It can be found in the constellation of Cepheus, which is virtually overhead during autumn evenings in the UK. The nebula occupies an area approximately equal to that of the full moon, but is very difficult to see visually with telescopes, especially from suburban locations

The nebula spans about 140 × 75 light-years in space and lies within our Milky Way Galaxy.
 
The Sharpless designation comes from the Sharpless catalogue of 312 emission nebulae (H II regions). The first edition was published by Stewart Sharpless in 1953 with 142 objects (Sh1) and the second and final version was published in 1959 with 312 objects (Sh2).

The cluster and nebula are part of an even larger and optically invisible molecular cloud designated NGC 7380E, estimated to contain 6000-15000 solar masses of dust and gas.  It is believed that the star formation that created the stars of NGC 7380 began some 4 million years ago and continued for another 2 million years before it largely ceased, with radiation from the stars dispersing the cloud from which they formed and ionising the remaining gas to produce the emission nebula we see today.

Mist and freezing condensation terminated all three imaging sessions before midnight. Auto-guiding was also a pig, with an RMS of anywhere between 0.7 to 1.2, giving rise to rather poor resolution and bloated stars. I'm not sure whether that's down to the mount (balance seems absolutely critical) or poor seeing. The seeing certainly wasn't good for any of these sessions: I could see the focus star rippling violently whilst trying to get a sharp focus, which in the end just turned out to be a best guess. 

The Ha, SII and OIII frames were stacked in Astroart and then RGB combined in PaintShop Pro. A blend of 50: 50 SII/Ha was used for the red channel, 30:70 Ha/OIII for the green and 100% OIII for the blue, with further curve changes, star reduction and denoising in PSP to give the final image. This was the first time I had tried adding some SII data into the mix, and it certainly seems to add some contrast to the final image.

The colloquial name of “the Wizard” alludes to an apparent figure in a pointy hat that can supposedly be made out in the nebulosity but like so many of these more recent monikers, I’m not sure I can see it myself.  Maybe it looks more like Roy Wood....  

Monday, 25 February 2019

The Rosette Nebula (NGC 2237-8, 46) with star cluster (NGC 2244)


Object: NGC 2237-8, 46 (nebula, Caldwell 49), NGC 2244 (open cluster, Caldwell 50)
Type: Emission nebula
Constellation: Monoceras
Distance: 4900 light years
Date: February 23rd, 24th. 2019
Equipment: ATIK 460EX, Vixen 114mm f5.3 ED114 refractor, NEQ6 mount, guiding with Lodestar X2/PHD
Subframes: 36 x 300s H-alpha, 15 x 200s each for RGB (2x2 binned), no flats, hot pixel removal in Astroart (no main frame darks).

The Rosette Nebula (also known as Caldwell 49) is a large H II region located near one end of a giant molecular cloud in the Milky Way galaxy region lying in the constellation of Monoceros.  The nebula has an apparent diameter of over a degree, more than twice the diameter of the full moon.  The open cluster NGC 2244 (Caldwell 50) is embedded within the nebulosity, and is easily seen in a small telescope.  The nebulosity itself is too faint to be seen visually from suburban skies, however.

The constellation of Monoceros is rather dim and ill-defined, lying to the east of its brilliant neighbour Orion.  The location of the Rosette is shown on the Stellarium sky map below:

Interestingly, recent research suggests that the shape of the Rosette nebula is a disc that is (rather fortuitously) orientated face-on to our Earth, rather than a sphere. 

Radiation from the hot young stars of NGC 2244 is sweeping out the gas from the centre of its parent nebula, an effect that can be quite easily seen in the above image.  Researchers at the University of Leeds have found that this cavity is far smaller than it should be given the age and mass of the cluster stars, and have proposed that a combination of magnetic field orientation and a disc-shaped cloud best accounts for the current appearance of the nebula.

The cluster and nebula measure roughly 130 light years in diameter.  The radiation from the cluster stars within the nebula causes the surrounding rarefied gases to fluoresce, producing the visible emission nebula.  The mass of the nebula is estimated to be around 10,000 solar masses.

A survey of the nebula with the Chandra X-ray Observatory has revealed the presence of numerous new-born stars inside the Rosette Nebula.  Altogether, approximately 2500 young stars lie in this star-forming complex.  Most of the ongoing star-formation activity is occurring in the dense molecular cloud to the south east of the bubble.

In his excellent book The Caldwell Objects, Steve O’ Meara corrects the still-widespread errors regarding the discovery and cataloguing of the Rosette Nebula. O’Meara credits the discovery of the Rosette’s central cluster, NGC 2244, to William Herschel, who unambiguously recorded the object in 1784.  The surrounding nebulosity was not seen by the eagle-eyed Herschel, but was discovered later in a piecemeal fashion – a testament to the faintness of it.  Albert Marth discovered a part of the bright north-west segment of the nebula (NGC 2238) in 1864, with E.E. Barnard recording a larger part of the same quadrant in 1883 (although Lewis Swift had actually observed it several years earlier).  In 1886, Swift found the bright patch of nebulosity in the eastern quadrant of the Rosette (NGC 2246), but it was not until the early 1890’s that photography showed the full extent of the nebula.

My image clearly shows the dark Bok globules that are strewn across the face of the Rosette.  The “globules” comprise of gas and dust, slowly coalescing from the surrounding nebula under its own forces of gravitational attraction, and are thought to be the birthplace of new stars and planets.


One of these curious areas, which stands out in the northern arch of the Rosette, resembles a leaping cat.  I’m not sure it has a common name or designation, but I have picked it out in the hydrogen alpha image stack, shown above.

I think the whole nebula resembles the skull of a fossilised pre-human, such as pithecanthropus, with the cluster NGC 2244 sitting in its left eye socket.

Colour image processing for the main image was conducted using my usual methods in AstroArt and PaintShop Pro, which are detailed here.

This is a bit of an improvement on my first attempt at imaging this object some 12 years ago. 

Friday, 15 February 2019

NGC 884 and NGC 869: The Double Cluster...


Objects: NGC 884 and NGC 869 (The "Double Cluster", Caldwell 14)
Type: Open Clusters
Constellation: Perseus
Distance: 7500 light years
Date: February 14th. 2019
Equipment: ATIK 460EX, Vixen 114mm f5.3 ED114 refractor, NEQ6 mount, guiding with Lodestar X2/PHD
Subframes: 20 x 300s luminance, 12 x 200s each for RGB (2x2 binned), no flats, hot pixel removal in Astroart (no main frame darks).

Known since antiquity, the “Double Cluster” was catalogued in 130 BC by Greek astronomer Hipparchus, who referred to it as a “nebula” or “cloudy spot”, one of the half a dozen then recognized.  The starry nature of the clusters remained a mystery until the invention of the telescope in the early 1600’s.

Now known respectively as h and chi Persei, or NGC 884 (to the east, or left, of the image) and NGC 869 (the cluster to the west, or right, of the image), the clusters themselves are separated by only a few hundred light-years and contain stars much younger and hotter than the Sun. 

In addition to being physically close together, the clusters' ages based on their individual stars are similar - evidence that both clusters were likely a product of the same star-forming region.  NGC 869 has a mass of 3700 solar masses and NGC 884 weighs in at 2800 solar masses; however, later research has shown both clusters are surrounded with a very extensive halo of stars, with a total mass for the complex of at least 20,000 solar masses. 

Based on their individual stars, the clusters are relatively young, both 12.8 million years old.  There are more than 300 blue-white super-giant stars in each of the clusters.

Discernible with the naked eye under dark skies, NGC 869 and NGC 884 occupy an area of sky approximately one degree across, each cluster being physically around 35 light years across. Binoculars are required to see the two clusters as separate entities from suburban skies. Telescopically, this is one of the most popular of objects for visual astronomers. It forms the “sword handle” of Perseus, as shown in the Stellarium star chart below:

This particular evening was clear but a bright gibbous moon was parked high in the sky, thus ruling out any attempt at faint nebulous objects. Processing was straightforward, with the RGB stacks combined in Astroart to give a colour image with pleasing and contrasting star colours. Some of the brighter stars have haloes, possibly caused by reflections from the RGB filters: Pixinsight acolytes would no doubt sneer at such things, but I quite like the effect.

Addition of the stacked luminance data as a luminance layer in PaintShop gave the final image above.  I used a star mask to just slightly drop the luminance and sharpen the stars surrounding the two clusters, just to get the clusters to stand out from the starry background a bit more.

Monday, 12 February 2018

NGC 2264 - The Christmas Tree Cluster & Cone Nebula...


Object: NGC 2264
Type: Open Cluster & Emission Nebulae
Constellation: Monoceros
Distance: 2400 light years
Date: 31 January, 06 & 10 February 2018
Equipment: SXV-H9, Vixen 114mm f5.3 ED refractor, NEQ6 mount, guiding with Lodestar X2/PHD
Subframes: 70 x 300s H-alpha, 20 x 300s RGB, no darks (hot pixel removal in Astroart instead).

Subframes were stacked in Astroart, the outputs converted to TIF files and then colour-composited in PaintShop Pro. I gathered the colour data on the third night, but I quite liked the mono H-alpha image on its own, so I posted that as well (below).


The colour data was a bit of a pig to process with the software I have.  First of all it became apparent that 300 second subs in H-alpha probably weren't long enough.  I had to stretch the resultant stack quite a way to get any decent detail, which introduced more noise than I really wanted. Then the blue colour stack turned out to be a slightly different size to the others, despite all being full frame without any need to resize.  I always refocus between filter changes as the colour correction on my old Vixen 114 ED refractor is not brilliant, so I guess this was the cause, particularly on the blue channel.  This made it difficult to stack the images for colour composition.  I did my best to manually rotate and resize in PaintShop, but the stars still show some odd haloes where the channels didn't line up.

I made two colour images, one created by the addition of green and blue channels to the H-alpha image above, which was used as the red channel for an RGB composite. This was a rather violent red, as anticipated, so I blended it with an HaRGB stack, which was the usual washed-out pink.  The blend gave a nice colour balance. The blue brilliance of the brighter stars in the cluster has led to some flaring around them.  I find the effect quite pleasing, however.

Clicking on either image pulls up the image icons, which can each be clicked on to "blink" each image. 

The Christmas Tree Cluster is a relatively young open cluster, formed between 3 and 30 million years ago. It is part of the NGC 2264 region, along with the Cone Nebula and the Fox Fur Nebula (Sharpless 273), and belongs to the Monoceros OB1 association, a loose association of very young stars located in the Orion Arm of the Milky Way.

The Christmas Tree Cluster (discovered by William Herschel in 1784) was given its nickname by astronomer Maurice Leyland for its triangular shape, like that of a Christmas tree, as seen through binoculars or a small telescope.  In the image above, the tip of the inverted “tree” is marked by the seventh magnitude star HD 47887 (just above the Cone Nebula as seen at the bottom of the image) with the bright variable star S Monocerotis (15 Monocerotis) to the north forming its “trunk”.

S Monocerotis is a bright irregular eruptive variable.  It is a multiple star system whose primary component is a hot, massive O-type star 10 times the size of the Sun and 30 times as massive.

The “Fox Fur Nebula” (Sharpless 273) can be seen below S Monocerotis in the above image.  Its resemblance to road-kill is quite remarkable, even in these modest images.  The bluish area arises from the reflection of starlight from dust in the region.  Some images show this reflection nebulosity to be much more extensive than seen here, probably because I did not compensate for the poorer blue sensitivity of the CCD with longer blue subs.

The Christmas Tree Cluster is visible to the naked eye in good conditions and appears quite striking in binoculars. The stars forming the Christmas tree shape, along with dozens of other tiny bright stars within the cluster, are a magical sight as seen in my VC200L with a 25mm eyepiece.  None of the associated nebulosity is visible however, at least, not to me.

NGC 2264 is listed as “Hidden Treasure 38” in Stephen O’Meara’s excellent book "Hidden Treasures" in the Cambridge University Press “Deep Sky Companion” series, the relevant excerpt from which can be found here.

Wednesday, 1 November 2017

Open Cluster M52...

Open Cluster in Cassiopeia: Messier 52
Object: Messier 52 (NGC 7654)
Type: Open Cluster 
Distance: 5100 light years 
Constellation: Cassiopeia
Date: 27 October 2017
Equipment: SXV-H9, Vixen 114mm f5.3 ED refractor
Subframes: 12 x 150 second luminance, 6 x 40 second 2x2 binned each for RGB

Images were acquired, stacked and colour-composited in AstroArt.  Final cosmetic processing was in PaintShop Pro.

This was really just a test of PHD guiding, which I had never used before and which worked just fine, first time.

Visually, this cluster is a real treat through the ED114 and a 15mm eyepiece, looking pretty much as it does in the image given a dark sky.