Monday, 30 January 2023

Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF)...

Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF)...
Object: Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF)
Type: Comet
Constellation: Ursa Minor
Distance: 48.9 million miles (at 20.15, Jan 27th 2023)
Equipment: Atik 460/EFW 2, Samyang 135mm lens@ F2, Vixen GPDX mount, guiding with Lodestar X2/PHD
Date: January 27th. 2023.
Subframes: 18 x 200s each for LRGB (comet): 6 x 20s each RGB for stars, flats, bias as dark frames.

Astronomers discovered Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF) using the 48-inch (1.2-meter) Samuel Oschin robotic telescope (part of the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF), located at Mt. Palomar in southern California). Once confirmed as a comet, the standard naming convention for it was adopted: it was the 3rd such object discovered in the fifth half-month (A, B, C, D, E) of the year, hence the label 2022 E3 (ZTF).

Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF) was in the morning sky, in the direction of the constellation Aquila when astronomers with the Zwicky Transient Facility first spotted it.

The ZTF program images the whole Northern Hemisphere every two nights looking for supernovae, variable stars, binary stars, flashing merging neutron stars, asteroids and comets. Overall, it has discovered 10 comets in the past three years.

When astronomers first detected C/2022 E3 in March 2022, the comet was around 400 million miles from the sun, or just within the orbit of Jupiter. At that time the comet was a very faint 17th magnitude, initially appearing as a stellar object until its proper motion showed it moving against the sky background.

The solid, core structure of a comet is known as the nucleus. Cometary nuclei may be up to 20 miles across (Hale-Bopp was one such monster) but are generally much smaller: the nucleus of Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF) has been estimated to be only a mile across. Because of their low mass, comet nuclei do not become spherical under their own gravity and often have irregular shapes.

Cometary nuclei are composed of an amalgamation of rock, dust, water ice, and frozen carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, methane, and ammonia. As such, they have been popularly described as "dirty snowballs". The surface of the nucleus is generally dry, dusty or rocky, suggesting that the ices are hidden beneath a surface crust several metres thick. In addition to the gases already mentioned, the nuclei contain a variety of organic compounds, which may include methanol, hydrogen cyanide, formaldehyde, ethanol, ethane, and other, more complex molecules such as long-chain hydrocarbons and amino acids.

These nuclei normally orbit the Sun at an immense distance right on the very edge of the Solar System as part of a sphere of such objects surrounding it, known as the Oort Cloud, Occasionally, one such nucleus will undergo a gravitational encounter, perhaps with the distant giant planet Neptune, one that will send it spiralling in towards the Sun.

As the frozen nucleus approaches the Sun, solar radiation increasingly releases a huge and extremely thin atmosphere around the comet called the "coma". It is this coma that we see, rather than the nucleus of the comet itself. The force exerted on the coma by the Sun's radiation pressure and solar wind cause a cometary "tail" to form pointing away from the Sun. Both the coma and tail are illuminated by the Sun and start to become visible when a comet passes into the inner Solar System. Cometary dust reflects sunlight directly while the gases glow from ionisation by the Sun's intense radiation.

It was it this point that the researchers made out the distinct tail, or coma, proving that C/2022 E3 (ZTF) was indeed a comet rather than an asteroid.

The green colour of Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF) is typical of comets and is believed to be due to the presence of an unstable form of carbon molecule (“dicarbon”) formed by the photolysis of the carbon compounds present in the nucleus, and which fluoresce with a green light under solar irradiation in the vacuum of space.

Occasionally a comet may experience a huge and sudden outburst of gas and dust, during which the size of the coma greatly increases for a period of time. This happened in 2007 to Comet 17P Holmes.

The streams of dust and gas each form their own distinct tail, pointing in slightly different directions. The tail of dust is left behind in the comet's orbit in such a manner that it often forms a curved tail called the type II or dust tail.  At the same time, the ion or type I tail, made of gases, always points directly away from the Sun because this gas is more strongly affected by the solar wind than is dust, following magnetic field lines rather than an orbital trajectory.  On occasions - such as when Earth passes through a comet's orbital plane, an “anti-tail”, pointing in the opposite direction to the ion and dust tails, may be seen.  This has been observed for Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF) and can be seen in my image.

By Jan. 12, 2023, the comet had travelled nearly another 300 million closer to Earth, becoming visible in the night sky near the northern constellation Corona Borealis. As stated earlier, solar radiation ionises the gas emitted from the comet, giving rise to complex magnetic fields around it. While making its closest approach to the Sun, a blast of radiation and solar particles (called a “coronal mass ejection”) swept over the comet, squeezing its magnetic field lines together and leading to a disruption in the flow of gas from the comet – a "tail disconnection event" which was clearly observed from Earth.

On February 1 and 2, Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF) will have reached its closest point to Earth (27 million miles) and can be seen overhead against the background of the rather obscure constellation of Camelopardalis, close to the borders of the better-known constellations Ursa Major and Ursa Minor. A map of the comet's progress is shown below:

Track of comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF) during February 2023...

A few days later, on Feb. 5 and 6, the comet will pass across the night sky to the west of the bright star Capella and then pass across the constellation Auriga. On Feb. 11th, it lies just to the east of Mars. From there, it will descend toward Taurus, becoming ever dimmer as it moves away from Earth, back out toward the edge of the solar system. 

The last time Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF) passed near the sun was 50,000 years ago. However, the latest orbital element calculations suggest that the comet’s recent close approach to the Sun has changed its orbital path to a parabolic orbit, rather than an elliptical one. Such an orbit is not “closed”, so after it sweeps around the sun C/2022 E3 will move back out into deep space, never to return again.

Much blather has been written by the excitable English press (particularly the Daily Mail) about poor old Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF), with headlines hyping it up to be an eyeball-searing, “one-in-a-lifetime event”. The truth, on the odd occasion that it can ever be found, is much often more mundane and is usually buried in the depths of the article. I can, however, reassure you that the comet will not affect house prices, cause cancer or lead to a rapprochement with the EU, whatever the Daily Mail may say in future.

The reality is that bright comets — the kind that can be seen easily without binoculars or telescopes — appear on average perhaps two or three times every 15 to 20 years. The last such comet to do that was Comet NEOWISE (C/2020 F3) in July 2020 – hardly a “once-in-a-lifetime” event.

Then there are the common comets, of which most are only visible either with good binoculars or a telescope. If you look at my blog (both old and new) indexes, you will find several examples of ones I have imaged over the years.

The vast majority of comets fall into this category, but C/2022 E3 (ZTF) may end up ranking as “slightly brighter than common”, since for a short while it may hover at around “fifth magnitude”, the limit of naked-eye visibility (and only for those fortunate enough to be blessed with dark, non-light polluted night skies). Additionally, the light from a comet is not a bright point, but a fuzzy, diffuse spot, one that will be increasingly difficult to pick up from a night sky containing a bright waxing moon that will be full on February 5th.

I was able to pick up the comet in 7x50 binoculars as a tiny fuzzy blob, but only because I knew exactly where to look (and I am also a fairly experienced night-sky observer armed with a computer-controlled camera set-up that was pointing the way!)

My image shows the comet displaying a distinct greenish colour and sprouting two faint tails, the gas tail being the long one to the right on the image. Sadly, such long-exposure images tend to be quite deceptive. For one thing they bring out colours and levels of detail that are not readily evident to the eye, even through binoculars or telescopes.

My CCD camera is a monochrome device, which is more sensitive than colour cameras. To get colour data, I have to take multiple exposures through colour filters. This works just fine with most celestial objects, which don’t move against the sky background.

Comet C/2022 E3 (ZTF) was “motoring” in celestial terms against the background sky, however. My set-up was able to “guide” the camera, locking it on to the comet, but this meant that the stars became trailed on the long cumulative exposures as the comet was moving quite perceptibly across the sky background. You will see the stars as faint grey (luminance), red, green then blue lines on the above image as the filters were placed in sequence during the imaging session.  

To capture stars for the image that allow a frame of positional reference, I just shot a few short exposures with the camera guiding on a star as usual. Combining the separate LRGB exposures together gave the colour image of the comet, with the stars overlaid in “screen mode” to give the view you see above.

"Starless" monochrome version....

Just as an experiment, I ran the individual luminance sub-frames through Starnet and then stacked them. Although a bit noisy, the cometary tails do seem to stand out a bit better, with the "fan" of the dust tail spread out across the comet's orbital plane and the twin tail gas clearly visible off to the right.

Saturday, 21 January 2023

IC 410 and IC 405: Tadpoles and the Flaming Star...

IC 410 and IC 405...

Object(s): IC 410 and IC 405
Type: Emission nebulae
Constellation: Auriga
Distance: 12,000 light years (IC 410) and 1500 light years (IC 405)
Equipment: Atik 460/EFW 2, Samyang 135mm lens@ F2, Vixen GPDX mount, guiding with Lodestar X2/PHD
Date: January 21st. 2023
Subframes: 18 x 300s each for Ha (1x1 binned) and OIII (2x2 binned), 12 x 200s (2x2 binned) for RGB: flats, bias as dark frames.

Location of the field of view in the night sky...
This particular area of the Orion Milky Way, beneath the constellation of Auriga, offers a rich zone of targets for any astrophotographer.  It is an area that I have visited several times before, but the 5 degree field of the Samyang f2 lens offers a chance to place many targets in the same field of view, to show their proximity to each other.

At the top left of the field of view lie the two open clusters, M38 and NGC 1907. I imaged these back in 2010: these clusters lie at around 4500 light years away, in between IC 410 and IC 405. 

Below these clusters lie "The Spider and the Fly", IC 417 and NGC 1931. I imaged these nearly three years ago . 

Discovered by Max Wolf on September 25th 1892, IC 417 ("the Spider") is a star cluster with an associated emission nebula, and lies about 7500 light years away. A wider area of hydrogen alpha emission extends from it and is classified as Sharpless 2-234. The smaller but brighter NGC 1931 was discovered by William Herschel on February 4th 1793, and is also an emission nebula with an associated cluster, as well as an element of reflection nebula. It, too, has a Sharpless designation (Sh2-237) and lies at a similar distance to IC 417.

Designations of the objects in the image field of view...

IC 410 is very much a background object, lying over 12,000 light years away. It is often called the "Tadpoles" nebula, after the two blobs of star-forming dust and gas within it, designated as Simeis 129 and 130 respectively, and which just about show up on the main wide field image above. I pictured these back in January 2019. The nebula IC 410 was discovered by Max Wolf on September 25th. 1892, and strictly speaking the IC 410 designation refers to the brightest area of nebulosity surrounding open cluster NGC 1983, an earlier John Herschel discovery from January 22nd 1827. These days, IC 410 is taken to be the entire nebula, which also has the Sharpless designation Sh2-236.

IC 405 (also designated Caldwell 31 by Sir Patrick Moore in his own catalogue of deep sky objects) is the "Flaming Star" nebula, which I pictured back in December 2019.  It was discovered on March 21st. 1892 by John Schaeberle. IC 405 also has a wider area of H-alpha nebulosity associated with it, designated as Sh2-229, although they all tend to be regarded as "IC 405" these days. At a mere 1,500 light year distant, it is a foreground object compared to the others in this field of view.

The whole area is designated as Sharpless 2-230.  I did take a wide field image of Sh2-230 back in January 2009, but since then both my equipment, software and processing techniques have improved (though the mount is still the same!)

In terms of processing, the biggest problem is that the nebulae are overwhelmed by a blizzard of the Milky Way stars. The magic of the "Starnet" software was used to "de-star" the various narrowband and colour image stacks, allowing me to replace just the brighter stars and clusters back into the image at a more visually aesthetic level.

Monday, 9 January 2023

Messier 45: The Pleiades...

Messier 45: The Pleiades...

Object: Messier 45
Type: Open cluster with reflection nebula
Constellation: Taurus
Distance: 440 light years
Equipment: Atik 460/EFW 2, Samyang 135mm lens@ F2, Vixen GPDX mount, guiding with Lodestar X2/PHD
Date: January 8th. 2023
Subframes: 12 x 300s each for LRGB, flats, bias as dark frames.

Set high in the winter sky as part of Orion’s glittering retinue, the Pleiades have certainly been known to Man ever since prehistoric times, ever since the first glimmerings of human intelligence compelled our ancestors to look upwards to the night sky in awe and wonder.

At a distance of about 440 light years, the Pleiades is one of the nearest star clusters to Earth. It is certainly the nearest Messier object to Earth, and is the most obvious star cluster to the naked eye in the night sky.

Location of image field of view in the night sky...
In Greek mythology, the Pleiades were the seven daughters of the Titan, Atlas, who was condemned by Zeus to forever bear the weight of the heavens as punishment for rebelling against the Olympian gods. Without their father to protect them, the Pleiades attracted the amorous attentions of the nearby hunter, Orion, and so to save them, Zeus transformed them into the stars we see today. Atlas and his wife, Pleione, also became part of the starry retinue of the Pleiades: “Pleiades” means “the daughters of Pleione”, and Mum and Dad keep watch over their daughters as the two stars closely adjacent stars on the eastern side of the cluster.


The Pleiades have been traditionally known as a group of seven stars. In various Greek and Roman writings, they are referred to as The Starry Seven, The Seven Virgins or the Seven Atlantic Sisters. These ancient descriptions come from days long before the advent of telescopes or binoculars, yet today, only six Pleiads are easily visible to the unaided eye. This state of affairs is supported by modern measurements of the brightness of the stars of the Pleiades. Only six of them are above “fifth magnitude”, the accepted threshold for naked eye visibility.

Magnitudes of the nine brightest members of the Pleiades are shown in the greyscale image below:

Magnitudes of the nine brightest Pleiads...

With an apparent magnitude of +2.85, the brightest star in the cluster is Alcyone, a blue-white B-type giant, similar in type to the other bright B-type stars in the Pleiades cluster. Alcyone has a mass of 6 times that of the Sun, and an effective radius of almost ten times that of the Sun, but the actual radius is lesser at poles and greater at the equator due to its high rotational velocity, which causes it to have an ellipsoidal shape. Its temperature is approximately 12,300 K (over twice as hot as our Sun) with the actual temperature being greater at the poles and lesser at the equator. Its luminosity is 2,030 times that of the Sun.

The light of the cluster is dominated by hot blue luminous stars that have formed comparatively recently in astronomical terms. Ages for star clusters can be estimated by comparing the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram for the cluster with theoretical models of stellar evolution and using this technique, ages for the Pleiades of between 75 and 150 million years have been estimated.

One of the oldest traditions concerning the cluster is the persistent myth of a “lost Pleiad”. The Greeks identified her as Electra, who is said to have veiled her face at the burning of Troy. Another story casts Merope in the role, as she reputedly hid her face in shame at having married a mortal, the King of Corinth, while all her other sisters were wedded to gods.

The Greek poet Aratus (310-240 BC) refers to the tradition of the “Lost Pleiad” when he wrote:

“…Their number seven, though the myths oft say
And poets feign, that one has passed away…”

This tradition is not confined to Greek mythology. The story of a lost Pleiad also appears in Japanese lore: the cluster is mentioned under the name Mutsuraboshi ("six stars") in the 8th-century Kojiki (an early Japanese chronicle dating from the early 8th century), and is now known as Subaru. A similar theme figures in the legends of Australian aborigines, natives of the Gold Coast of Africa and the head-hunters of Borneo:

“Their Sister Stars that were once seven
Mourn for their missing mate in Heaven…”

It seems that the legend of the lost Pleiad may have a basis in fact, however. Those modern brightness measurements have revealed that the mythical mother of the Pleiades, Pleione, is variable in brightness by at least half a magnitude, and may well once have been above the threshold of naked eye visibility.

Galileo was the first astronomer to view the Pleiades through a telescope. He discovered that the cluster contains many stars too dim to be seen with the naked eye. He published his observations, including a sketch of the Pleiades showing 36 stars, in his treatise Sidereus Nuncius in March 1610.

Today, we know that the cluster is about 80 light-years across and contains over 1,000 statistically confirmed members, a figure that excludes an unresolved number of binary stars, which make up over 50% of the total stars in the cluster.

Curiously, the 11th century Talmud (the central text of Rabbinic Judaism) uses the term kimah to describe the number of stars in the Pleiades, a word which means “over one hundred”.

Another thing revealed by long exposure photography is that the Pleiades are veiled in fine, dense threads of nebulosity, like cirrus clouds or interstellar cobwebs. It is questionable whether these are truly visible to the naked eye today, yet some translations of the biblical Book of Job refer to the “Chains of the Pleiades”. The seventh century Arabian poet Amr al Kais also hints at the nebulosity:

“The hour when the Pleiades appeared in the firmament
Like the folds of a silken sash variously decked with gems…

Perhaps the most famous reference to the Pleiades nebulosity in English literature occurs in Tennyson’s Locksley Hall…

“Many a night from yonder ivied casement, ere I went to rest
Did I look on great Orion, sloping slowly to the west
Many a night I saw the Pleiads, rising thro’ the mellow shade
Glitter like a swarm of fireflies tangled in a silver braid…”

Charles Messier measured the position of the cluster and included it as M45 in his catalogue of comet-like objects, published in 1771. Messier's inclusion of the Pleiades has been noted as curious, as most of Messier's objects were much fainter and more easily confused with comets. The brightest area of nebulosity (called “Tempel’s Nebula) lies to the south of Merope does indeed look comet-like in appearance, however, so perhaps that is why Messier included the Pleiades in his famous catalogue.

These reflection nebulae can clearly be seen in the main image above, and more detailed photographs of the area show a mass of fine filaments that glitter with reflected starlight.

They are included in the 1966 catalogue of reflection nebulae compiled by Sidney van den Bergh, and are shown marked on the grey scale image below:

van den Burgh reflection nebulae in the Pleiades...

This dust was once thought to be left over material from the cluster star formation, but is now considered likely to be an unrelated dust cloud in the interstellar medium through which the stars are currently passing. The dust cloud is estimated to be moving at a speed of approximately 18 km/s relative to the stars in the cluster.  

The long exposures used in this image show up the interstellar dust around the Pleiades as a brownish cloudy background.

The total mass contained in the cluster is estimated to be about 800 solar masses and is dominated by fainter and redder stars, although its visible light is dominated by young, hot blue stars. The cluster contains many brown dwarfs, which are objects with less than about 8% of the Sun's mass, not heavy enough for nuclear fusion reactions to start in their cores and become proper stars. They may constitute up to 25% of the total population of the cluster, although they contribute less than 2% of the total mass.

The Pleiades have long been known to be a physically related group of stars rather than just a chance alignment. When studies were first made of the stars' proper motions, it was found that they are all moving in the same direction across the sky, at the same rate, further demonstrating that they were related. The cluster itself is moving at the leisurely pace of 32 km/sec towards the south of what is currently the constellation of Orion. Like most open clusters, the Pleiades will not stay gravitationally bound forever. Astronomers estimate that the cluster will survive for about another 250 million years, after which it will gradually disperse due to gravitational interactions with its galactic neighbourhood.